(Fact Check): Ten candidates vying for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination took the stage Wednesday in Miami for the first of back-to-back debate nights. Another 10 candidates who qualified for the debates will appear on the same stage Thursday.

Here is how the candidates’ remarks stacked up against the truth.

GOV. JAY INSLEE

“I am the only candidate here who has passed a law protecting a woman’s right of reproductive rights in health insurance and the only candidate who passed a public option. I respect everyone’s goals and plans here, but we have one candidate who advanced the ball.”

Mostly true.

Inslee, of Washington, signed a bill into law last year that would require all health insurers to cover abortion if they also cover maternity care. But none of the other candidates onstage would be in a position to pass such a bill because it is a state prerogative. And, as Sen. Amy Klobuchar jumped in to point out, many of them — especially the three women onstage — have strong records on protecting abortion rights.

REP. TIM RYAN

“The bottom 60% haven’t seen a raise since 1980.”

This is exaggerated.

Ryan’s general point is that income inequality has been widening, with the wealthiest faring far better over the past 40 years. However, Americans in the bottom income brackets have seen their incomes rise during that period, albeit at a slower rate than those at the top. According to the Peter G. Peterson Foundation, from 1979 to 2014 the top 20% saw a 101% increase in their average incomes. For everyone else, incomes rose by 32%.

SEN. AMY KLOBUCHAR

“I am just simply concerned about kicking half of America off of their health insurance in four years, which is exactly what this bill says.”

Mostly true.

Klobuchar was referring to Sen. Bernie Sanders’ bill that would put a Medicare-for-all national health insurance program into effect over a four-year period. His bill would create a universal Medicare program that would cover all Americans — including the roughly half who are currently covered by employer plans — with generous benefits and minimal out-of-pocket costs; private insurers could offer coverage only for services not covered by the public program, such as cosmetic surgery.

JULIAN CASTRO

“The reason that they are separating these little children from their families is that they are using Section 1325 of that act which criminalizes coming across the border to incarcerate the parents and then separate them. Some of us on this stage have called to end that section, to terminate it, some like Congressman O’Rourke have not.”

True.

Section 1325 is the part of the U.S. Code that criminalizes illegal entry into the country as a misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment or fines. Castro is right that O’Rourke has opposed repealing the law.

“In the vast majority of cases, there is no need to incarcerate or to detain migrant families and especially children,” O’Rourke said on CNN in June. “But if somebody is attempting to smuggle human beings into the United States, if they are attempting to cross illegal drugs into this country, I want to make sure that we have the legal mechanism necessary to hold them accountable and to detain them to make sure they do not pose a threat to this country or to our communities.”

“I do not think that it should be repealed,” O’Rourke continued.

SEN. CORY BOOKER

“I will single out companies like Halliburton or Amazon that pay nothing in taxes.”

This is exaggerated.

Amazon paid no federal income taxes in 2018. It does, however, pay state taxes and it does not always come away with a tax bill of zero. The company said in April that it paid $2.6 billion in corporate taxes over the past three years. Halliburton’s tax bills also swing in both directions. For instance, in January 2018, it was hit by an $882 million tax charge related to changes in the tax law.

BETO O’ROURKE

“And yet despite what Purdue Pharma has done, their connection to the opioid crisis and the overdose deaths that we’re seeing throughout this country, they have been able to act with complete impunity and pay no consequences.”

This is exaggerated.

It’s true that no one from the company has gone to jail, but Purdue Pharma, the maker of OxyContin, is facing lawsuits around the country and recently paid a $270 million settlement in Oklahoma. In 2007, three of the company’s executives pleaded guilty as individuals to misbranding, a criminal violation.

This article originally appeared in The New York Times.