“I didn’t know how to respond,” recalled Cushing, who is now a New Hampshire state representative. “I knew he was trying to give me some comfort.”
Cushing, a Democrat, was then — and is today — a death penalty opponent. And in the 31 years since his father’s murder, he has become one of the nation’s leading opponents of capital punishment. But his efforts at repeal in his home state have always fallen short.
On Thursday, though, New Hampshire moved a step closer to becoming the last state in New England to end capital punishment after the state Senate voted 17-6 in favor of repealing the death penalty. That followed a 279-88 vote for repeal in the state House last month.
Twice before — in 2000, and again last year — both chambers have voted for repeal, only to be blocked by a governor’s veto.
But this time, the House and the Senate each voted with the two-thirds majority necessary to override another threatened veto by the governor, Chris Sununu, a Republican who is a capital punishment proponent.
Once the legislation reaches his desk, Sununu would have five days to issue a veto. His office did not immediately say after the vote on Thursday whether he still intends to veto the bill. The margin of the Senate’s vote on Thursday appeared to make it unlikely that Sununu can block a repeal.
If the legislation becomes law, New Hampshire would become the 21st state to get rid of the death penalty, continuing a national trend toward fewer executions. Bills to limit the application of the death penalty or to repeal it have also been introduced in at least 18 states this year.
With the suspension of capital punishment announced last month in California, most people in the United States now live in places where the death penalty is either outlawed or subject to moratoria, said Robert Dunham, executive director of the Death Penalty Information Center, a Washington, D.C., nonprofit.
In nine states, he added, repeal bills have significant Republican sponsorship or support. In New Hampshire, too, the debate has not fallen exclusively along party lines. (The House was controlled by Republicans during the 2000 vote for repeal, and it was a Democratic governor, Jeanne Shaheen, who vetoed that legislation.)
In recent years, some Republicans in the state have changed their stances on the issue and now favor abolishment; some have cited the more than $5 million the state has spent on the prosecution and defense of the state’s only current death row inmate as part of their reasoning for the change. At the same time, some Democrats still back capital punishment.
State Sen. John Reagan, a Republican who favors repeal, said he had long believed that the government’s primary role was to keep people safe, and that the death penalty was part of that.
His views changed, though, because “the more and more experience I had with government, I concluded that the general incompetency of government didn’t make them the right people to decide life and death.”
But it is Sununu who has remained the principal opponent to abolishing the death penalty, and who, according to supporters of repeal, had continued to urge Republican colleagues to reject the legislation.
“Gov. Sununu will always stand up for law enforcement and the families of crime victims,” said Benjamin Vihstadt, his spokesman, who said that representatives of the governor’s office had met with people on both sides of the issue.
But Cushing said Sununu had avoided meeting with the relatives of victims who see the issue the same way Cushing does.
“The governor has positioned himself as saying he’s vetoing the repeal of the death penalty because he cares about law enforcement and victims, but he’s refused to meet with murder victims’ family members who oppose the death penalty,” Cushing said.
The debate over capital punishment has simmered in New Hampshire for decades, though the state hasn’t executed anyone in 80 years. The state’s only death row inmate — Michael Addison, 39, who was convicted of murdering a police officer — has no execution date. What’s more, the state does not actually have an execution chamber at this point. (State law authorizes lethal injection as the means of execution, with hanging as a backup option.)
Asked how the state would proceed with Addison’s execution if it ever came to that, a Corrections Department spokeswoman said: “We have worked with our legal counsel on draft policies and procedures that have not yet been finalized. If an execution order is enacted then we would finalize the policies and move forward.”
Yet Addison’s fate has taken on an outsize role in the legislative debate, serving as a rallying point for opponents of repeal, including state law enforcement associations.
The legislation is not retroactive, and would not affect Addison’s case. But opponents of repeal say passage of the legislation would nevertheless make it more likely that a judge would be inclined to reduce his sentence.
Laura Briggs, the widow of the officer killed by Addison, told a legislative committee last month that she worried that a vote to repeal would almost inevitably lead to the commutation of Addison’s sentence.
“The person that killed my husband was smirking in court. He had no interest in feeling remorseful,” Briggs said. She added that her husband had also believed in capital punishment. “It’s about protecting our society from evil people that do evil things.”
The debate has evoked powerful emotions on both sides. State Rep. David Welch, a Republican, said he changed his mind to favor repeal after his wife died two years ago, causing profound grief and prompting him to be baptized.
“The victim’s family goes through grief similar to what I went through,” Welch said in a recent speech. But “when that inmate is put to death, there’s another family going through the grief, and they’re innocent.”
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.